Reading your profile
A useful profile gives you something to reflect on. Here is how to read the scales and keep their limits in view.
The report is a fictional example. Its positions demonstrate the format and do not come from an assessment of you.
Leans toward exploration
In this example, exploring alternatives is more characteristic than choosing a familiar approach straight away.
That may bring useful perspectives when a question is open-ended. When time is limited, deciding what is worth exploring can matter just as much.
| What you see | How to read it |
|---|---|
| Category | Related dimensions, such as thinking or connection. Read them together rather than treating a category as one score. |
| Dimension | One particular tendency. The two endpoints describe different preferences; neither is a better result. |
| Position marker | Where the fictional example sits. It is not a percentile or a comparison with a population. |
| Midpoint | The visual middle. It can leave room for both preferences; it does not mean “average person.” |
| Highlighted span | Direction from the middle to the marker, not confidence or an uncertainty interval. |
| Details | An interpretation and the circumstances that could change it. |
| Missing information | An unsupported conclusion should be shown as unavailable, not as zero or a middle position. |
Think of a specific moment when a description fits, and one when it does not.
A preference for company can sit alongside a preference for focused conversation. Related tendencies need not all point the same way.
Responsibilities, relationships, and experience can change how a tendency shows up.
The assessment is in development. Our method notes describe what still needs to be established.
